Difference between revisions of "T-Framework"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CheeseMeese (talk | contribs) (filler page for t-fw) |
(tfw section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Overview == | |||
T-Framework (also referred to as Framework and T-USFG) is a topicality argument designed to answer non topical critical affirmatives. In most topicality debates, both debaters agree that the affirmative should be topical, but disagree on whether the affirmative is topical. However, many critical affirmatives will contest whether the affirmative should have the burden to be topical in the first place. Because of this, T-Framework is a unique topicality argument, as most 2NRs on T-Framework will not focus on proving the aff is not topical, but rather on proving debates about the resolution are valuable and topicality is a norm worth preserving. | |||
== Core Standards and Offense == | |||
quick overview | |||
=== Fairness === | |||
library disad | |||
=== Clash === | |||
also library disad | |||
=== Skills === | |||
== Miscellaneous Arguments == | |||
=== Topical Version of the Aff (TVA) === | |||
=== Truth Testing === | |||
=== Ballot Paradox === | |||
=== Jurisdiction === | |||
Revision as of 18:10, 6 January 2022
Overview
T-Framework (also referred to as Framework and T-USFG) is a topicality argument designed to answer non topical critical affirmatives. In most topicality debates, both debaters agree that the affirmative should be topical, but disagree on whether the affirmative is topical. However, many critical affirmatives will contest whether the affirmative should have the burden to be topical in the first place. Because of this, T-Framework is a unique topicality argument, as most 2NRs on T-Framework will not focus on proving the aff is not topical, but rather on proving debates about the resolution are valuable and topicality is a norm worth preserving.
Core Standards and Offense
quick overview
Fairness
library disad
Clash
also library disad